![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWMW7ceUdHQtFzI1UhEBdeaOD_wtVBOmIZzHrUdO-1WGAeCbVc-VkhuxFf2qJHrcJQkZmJpeCnosLfTqLgM5qkxZoJiDQUocuuGCJ44eGHWHrOxQIaeatBsfVIrgRpnR8I8HMQEuX4R2Q/s320/sarah-palin-crazy.jpg)
Here's Iowa:
Candidate May 2010 January 2011 ShiftGot that? Here's New Hampshire:
Mike Huckabee 27% 30% +3
Sarah Palin 17% 15% -2
Newt Gingrich 16% 13% -3
Mitt Romney 15% 18% +3
Ron Paul 7% 6% -1
John Thune 2% 3% +1
Candidate April 2010 October 2010 ShiftSo what's it mean? Well, first off, it means that no one's paying attention to people who aren't declared candidates. Shocking, I know. This also means that fundraising totals for the tier twos- Pawlenty, Bachmann, Thune, etc.- will be crucial. Could there be room for a late run at this? Yeah, but only for funded candidates. My sense is that this favors the front-runners. Romney, Huckabee, Palin, and Gingrich all will gather lots of attention no matter the early polling, and to be ahead means they will squeeze others out. It could hurt them too, if they all stay stagnant for months. We'll see in due time I guess, but clearly no one has the early mo'.
Mitt Romney 39% 40% +1
Mike Huckabee 11% 13% +2
Newt Gingrich 11% 10% -1
Sarah Palin 13% 10% -3
Tim Pawlenty 3% 4% +1
No comments:
Post a Comment